Comparative Negligence: What You Need to Know

‍

Personal injury cases often involve complex legal concepts, and one of the most important principles to understand is comparative negligence. Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine that determines how damages are apportioned when more than one party is at fault for an accident. In this blog, we'll explore the concept of comparative negligence, how it works, and why it's crucial in personal injury cases.

‍

Understanding Comparative Negligence:

‍

Comparative negligence, also known as comparative fault, is a legal concept that assesses the degree of fault or negligence of each party involved in an accident. It recognizes that accidents are rarely the result of one party's actions alone and that multiple parties may share responsibility for an incident.

‍

Two Types of Comparative Negligence:

‍

There are two main types of comparative negligence:

‍

1. Pure Comparative Negligence:

‍

   In a pure comparative negligence system, each party involved in an accident is assigned a percentage of fault based on their actions or negligence. Even if one party is predominantly at fault, the other party can still recover damages, reduced by their assigned percentage of fault.

‍

2. Modified Comparative Negligence:

‍

   In a modified comparative negligence system, there is typically a threshold or "bar" that determines whether a party can recover damages. If a party's percentage of fault exceeds the threshold, they are barred from recovering any damages.

‍

How Comparative Negligence Works:

‍

Let's consider an example to illustrate how comparative negligence works:

‍

Imagine a car accident in which Driver A is texting while driving, and Driver B runs a red light. The collision results in injuries to both drivers.

‍

In a comparative negligence assessment:

‍

- Driver A may be found 70% at fault for texting while driving.

- Driver B may be found 30% at fault for running a red light.

‍

If the total damages are $100,000:

‍

- Driver A, who is 70% at fault, can recover $30,000 (30% of $100,000).

- Driver B, who is 30% at fault, can recover $70,000 (70% of $100,000).

‍

Why Comparative Negligence Matters:

‍

Comparative negligence is vital in personal injury cases for several reasons:

‍

1. Fairness: It allows for a fair distribution of liability and damages, recognizing that accidents often involve multiple parties' actions.

‍

2. Recovery for Plaintiffs: Even if a plaintiff is partially at fault, they can still recover damages, albeit reduced by their percentage of fault.

‍

3. Negotiations: Comparative negligence can influence settlement negotiations. Parties are often motivated to reach an agreement based on their assigned percentages of fault.

‍

4. Court Proceedings: In cases that go to court, comparative negligence guides the court in determining the final award based on the parties' degrees of fault.

‍

Consulting a Personal Injury Attorney:

‍

Navigating comparative negligence and understanding how it applies to your personal injury case can be complex. An experienced personal injury attorney can provide valuable guidance and ensure that your rights are protected. They can help you build a strong case and advocate for the fairest possible outcome, taking comparative negligence into account.

‍

Conclusion:

‍

Comparative negligence is a fundamental concept in personal injury law, recognizing that accidents often involve shared responsibility. Understanding how comparative negligence works and seeking the assistance of a qualified personal injury attorney can significantly impact the outcome of your case. At The Corry Law Firm, we are dedicated to advocating for your rights and helping you navigate the legal complexities of personal injury cases. Contact us for expert legal guidance and representation, ensuring that you receive the compensation you deserve. Your well-being is our top priority.

‍